Corsair
Yes, that’s what I do, until I get the smiley face; and I’ve had hours of good tracking after doing that.
As others have commented, it shows that the first reported deviations are reality; when you click ‘refresh’, the reported deviations are spurious.
Though it could be that ZWO have very recently tried something to fix the problem.
My experience had been similar to others – on first ‘refresh’ without any physical adjustment to the mount, the polar deviation values were different from those after ‘calculate’; on each subsequent ‘refresh’, the deviation values seemed to get progressively larger.
However the other night, I noticed a change in the pattern. The different deviation values (around 2 degrees in this case) still occurred after the initial ‘refresh’; but on each subsequent ‘refresh’, the values remained quite close (within around 2 arc minutes) to those initial values – and this margin is probably to be expected given that the ASPA methodology is an approximation (ie mathematically imperfect).
The attached screenshots show the base ‘calculate’ values, the initial ‘refresh’, and some subsequent ‘refreshes’.
Unfortunately, the clouds rolled in at that point, so my ad hoc testing was cut short.
I have designed a set of test scenarios to better identify the pattern.
Hopefully the skies will be clear on Saturday night.



