174MM or 174MM-Cool for planetary imaging?

lcd1080

I'm trying to decide whether the 174MM-Cool offers any advantage over the 174MM for imaging Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. I already have a cooled camera for DSO imaging so I can't see a reason to buy another cooled camera unless it offers a unique advantage for planetary imaging.

Thanks,

Pete

riklaunim

Only if you want to do some advanced planetary imaging - CH4 or UV band where exposures are longer, gain high and cooling would limit the noise a bit.

Sam@ZWO

I agree with riklaunim's reply