Hello Chen, Ahh Patents! for a long time we viewed Patents as a double edged sword. A lot of in house engineering innovation was necessary to create the kinds of high speed automation capabilities necessary to produce our products to the extreme quality requirements we demanded. In the final analysis we viewed a lot of that as very valuable trade secrets. In many cases we had to take off the shelve equipment and re engineer it well beyond the capabilities of the original mechanism or sensor. We often had to re imagining how to use something that was designed to do a certain function, to be able to do something very different Think of it like re engineering my Ioptron CEM25ec and in the process give it the abilities of an 10 Micron Mount while outwardly nothing has changed.
So thus comes the Patent conundrum. Since you hold so many yourself I am sure you know exactly what I am speaking about. We did tend to more often patent certain things about our products more than or manufacturing processes. Essentially because reverse engineering a product is pretty straight forward and thus finding ways to circumvent patents easier than figuring out the secrets involved in putting together millions of our product each day with zero defect with nothing to hold in your hand or a patent you could read to find out. But if we could at least write the patents broadly enough and still get that patent issued it was worth doing.
I could tour you through one of our facilities to show you how we accomplished the almost impossible, as well as point out countless amazing trade secrets but then I would have to kill you as a result. Since we wouldn't want to deprive these forums of your amazing expertise I suggest for the sake of science we dismiss the tour idea :-)))))))
BTW I learned this lesson the hard way as a young engineer very early in my career. I was showing a vendor through one of our manufacturing areas and proudly showed off to him how I had designed an addition to his product that gave it a completely new function they never considered....... Shortly after they introduced an entirely new product completely based on my unpatented design. To this day that one hurts!!! But it was a great lesson at an early age.
Anyway, back to the PA issue I believe once again you will be proven correct. By not using the auto refresh during PA both the accuracy as well as time involved to PA will be improved. I suppose another simple improvement ZWO could add would be the ability to set some N number as you mention to refresh to. But they have enough to already work on just getting a few other things right and there already exists a very effective solution :-))
BTW This morning I was able to upload the FW update for my 120mini guide camera but sadly a look out the window right now is not looking at all encouraging for tonight. It was supposed to be partly cloudy. But right now that is not the case. Last forecast still says it will be, so I have my fingers crossed Al