Dspital Would using the Asiair to sync to a number of stars bring the mount into sync with the sky?
I think it will depend on your mount. You can try doing 5 or more syncs at various places in the sky to see if the mount learns from them through a sync to mount commands, instead of through a hand controller.
5 to 6 star syncs is about what is needed for a mount to create a decent model of itself, but you may need fewer than that even -- depends on how many star syncs for the mount to discover the HA of zenith. In the good old days when we used to do everything manually, Takahashi mounts had a single sync-to-zenith command, but I have not seen that command in today's mounts. But even that only sync the mount's HA to agree with a star at the declination of zenith. It can still be off when a star is farther north or south of the zenith, if the mount is not also perfectly polar aligned.
On mounts that have at least a relative encoder, there is sometimes an offset that you can set relative to the built in home sensor. Example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IC1j8i-1H4
One thing that you can do to help diagnose the problem is to start up the mount, home it, and then before doing any star syncs or plate solve syncs, do a "blind" GOTO to some coordinate near the zenith. Then do a plate solve, and see how much the RA value is different to where you have asked it to do the GOTO. Try a coordinate east of the Meridian, since that is where your "auto" meridian flip starts at.
Another thing you can experiment with is to position the mount (with tracking turned on) north of zenith, just a little east of the meridian. Do a plate solve to record the RA (do not sync the mount to that solved location). Then do a declination slew (not a GOTO) to the south and do a second plate solve to discover the second true RA. The two RA should be identical. If the two RA do not agree (for example if polar alignment is poor), the meridian transit time will also be different for stars with different declinations.
If you like this kind of thing, take a look at Taki's white paper:
http://takitoshimi.starfree.jp/matrix/matrix_method_rev_e.pdf
Section 5.4 is the one pertaining to this thread, where he shows how to obtain the mount position using 2 and 3 stars, assuming there are no other mount errors (like cone errors, etc).
Chen