Seestar S80, which specs are possible? : Page 2

Seestar S80, which specs are possible?

krisscross78

Astrop Look at this. And now?

Astrop

krisscross78 It's just a zoomed in crop, there's barely any detail, the other telltale is there are no moons in the image, when imaging Jupiter you can resolve at least the four main moons with decent optics and the right exposure. Try pointing the Seestar at Mars and Saturn and see what "detail" they can resolve. As mentioned you need long focal length and aperture to image planets with any surface details.

Gulyas K

krisscross78

I see it. And this Jupiter image is a joke with a big amount of digital zoom.
Look at this one I took with my C11. This is a detailed Jupiter image. The one you attacked is not detailed at all. Just some white and dark lines and the footprint of the Great Red Spot.

krisscross78

Gulyas K thanks for your reply.

Support@Seestar

krisscross78
This is definitely a real photo. We have no need to create any falsifications.

JWRI97

Gulyas K

I’m with you on this. Planets should be a secondary focus if a focus at all. Much rather have what you suggested.

GERARD7744

Je suis pour le fait d'avoir un diamètre de lunette plus grand (80mm me semble bien) cependant est-ce que ce sera suffisant pour une image planétaire?

Support@Seestar

GERARD7744
My answer is that the larger the aperture, the more detail you can capture.

2KcObYo4

Just need in built ( in box designed ) eq, better pro cam maybe 585 , maybe 60 or 70 mm and additional ( moving ) barlow 2x on/off

Support@Seestar

2KcObYo4 Are you hoping for the following improvements in a smart telescope?

built-in equatorial mount (EQ) integrated into the design, rather than an external add-on.
better professional camera with a more powerful sensor than the current one.
larger aperture, preferably between 60mm and 70mm, instead of the current size.
switchable 2x Barlow lens that can be turned on or off as needed for more flexible magnification.

I understand your desire for a better experience, and I will share your feedback with the team and continue working towards improvements.

LA3QMA

Support@Seestar I'm not an advanced user but the first time i discovered that there was ok smart telescopes i found the Dwarf2. I have two "regular" scopes with barlow so i was thinkering the possibility to add this to the Dwarf. But then i learned a little more about how it works and where it should be positioned. I ended up buying the SeestarS50 and have not regret this. But i think the formfactor design for the Seestar allows space for i.e a barlow that can be turned on/off. And at some point a built in EQ or a practical add-on kit would be great.

Support@Seestar

LA3QMA You’ve made a great choice with the Seestar S50! It’s great to hear that you’re happy with it. Your idea of an integrated or switchable Barlow lens is very interesting, and the form factor does seem to have potential for such an addition. A built-in EQ or a well-designed add-on kit would also be a fantastic upgrade for advanced tracking. I’ll pass your suggestions along to the team—thanks for sharing your thoughts! 😊

Sonixx

My Wishlist:
-no external wedge for EQmode, solution via internal rotator
-better sensor, 585?
-keep internal filter slider, but with the dual narrowband filter being more narrow
-all in one package like S50, just one medium sized box
-additional integrated mini scope and sensor for guiding.

aperture not that important, form factor >Aperture

Regards,

Stephan

« Previous Page