BBB Do you have any recommendations as to what to purchase in a different travel router, etc. to perform the same function as the Vonet but successfully?
I had used a spare TP-Link AC750 travel router that I had when I first turned on the ASIAIR v.2 (so-called "pro") and found the ASIAIR's WiFi to be unusable.
The reason I had picked the TP-link is that you can power it from 5V (or from 12V using a buck converter). I do not lead 110V AC out to the telescope; I lead out a 12V 30A DC power supply, together with a secondary 12V 5A uninterruptible DC power supply for the mount (lots of power outages in the boonies of Portland; too many trees). So everything has to run on 12V.
The TP-Link's LAN port is also limited to 100 Mbps.
Since my ASIAIR is inside a large waterproof box at the base of my Tri-pier with lots of space left, I eventually replaced the TP-link with an eero Mesh router that is part of my home mesh network (price is of course not even in the same neighborhood :-). The eero is MIMO, and uses 3 bands (2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz, with the backhaul on its own private network), and its Ethernet interface is Gigabit. Effectively, the ASIAIR is now connected directly to my home network as a node of the mesh. I use a USB Power Delivery (PD) adapter to convert 12V to the USB 9V specs that the eero needs.
If you check the ASIAIR Facebook page, many folks are using the TP-Link. Some use using the GL.iNet devices, which can also operate off of 5V.
If you don't want to fuss around, and if 100 Mpbs is fast enough (you would want a faster download with an ASI6200 camera), just get the TP-Link AC750 version (the price difference from the N300 version is pretty insignificant, so you might as well opt for the one that is 5 GHz capable). Lots of people got it to work with the ASIAIR.
In any case, the AC750 travel router from TP-Link should have virtually the same specs on paper as the Vonets (both limited by 100 Mbps LAN), but based on Amazon reviews, and now a couple of unfavorable mentions on the ASIAIR Facebook page, the Vonets may have problems with WiFI range that the TP-Link does not.
Now, if you are adventurous, this particular GL.iNet model (Slate) could be quite interesting:
https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-ar750s/
It also has AC750 specs on the WiFi side, but is 50% more expensive at Amazon than the AC750 version from TP-Link. However, it has a Gigabit Ethernet port (3 in fact). So, the speed through WiFi is now potentially the full 430 Mbps, instead of being limited to 100 Mpbs by the LAN port.
I have no experience with it, however. But if I were to look for a 5V powered router for the ASIAIR today, the GL.iNet Slate is probably at the very top of my list. An icing on the cake is that when you are next to it, you can connect an iPad to one of the Slate's unused Ethernet ports, and get up to the 900 Mbps speed.
IMHO, the Slate wipes the floor with both the TP-Link and the Vonets in terms of bang-for-the-buck. For raw speed and integration into my home network, it still won't be as good as the eero mesh router, though :-).
By the way, I could not figure out why there are so many complaints on both Amazon and the ASIAIR Facebook page about heat from the Vonets. If you look at the power that FCC allows you to transmit on the WiFi bands, and even assuming a pitiful 50% transmitter efficiency, there is still no way a WiFi device could get that hot. If it were transmitting more power than FCC allows, why are there are also complaints (again both on Amazon and ASIAIR Facebook page) that the WiFi range is questionable. The combination of high heat and poor range just don't reconcile.
Heat anywhere close to the light path of a telescope is bad news -- I definitely would not mount it anywhere on the OTA.
Chen