Kevin_A I am leaning towards the evo50dx due to it being 242mm and i could use all the extra rez i can get but star quality matters most to me.
IMHO, the build quality of the EVOguide is very "Chinese." I.e., heavy for no reason, and poorly machined -- worse than a typical Askar even (IMO, the typical Askar is about the same as a WO). Just compare the threads to the ones on Takahashis and PreciseParts.com.
The Askar 180p is a pleasant surprise. If I didn't know it was designed in China, I would have thought it was designed in Japan, Korea or the West. (If you want to split hairs, the Samyangs don't have the build quality of the Sigma ARTs or the Canon Ls, but the build quality of an RST-135 is nothing short of exquisite). The build quality and attention to engineering details (what ZWO really lacks, for example) is definitely a couple of notches up from a typical Askar -- even the focusing ring is notched to directly take an MXL belt.
As I had earlier mentioned, I haven't looked at the stars of the EVOguide, but from various postings on Cloudy Nights, the flattener is definitely needed. Like the FSQ-85, the EVOguide's flattener does not change the focal length. (To be pedantic, the flattener on the FSQ is actually 1.01x and not 1.0x).
The 180p optics is identical to the non-p version. Quite decent, at least for the FOV of an ASI178. The Bahtinov diffraction spikes are quite clean (I find that the straighter and thinner the spikes on a monochrome camera, the more likely it is more APO-like, as the spikes are really made up of segments (dashed lines) of color components, which you can see on a color camera). But like all Askars that I have (I also have the ACL200, FMA230, FRA300), they all have a chromatic bloat. The spot diagram can be found here at FLO's site:
https://www.firstlightoptics.com/askar-telescopes/askar-fma180-f45-ed-apo-v2-astrograph-lens-reducer.html
Notice that the spot's GEO radius (which includes chromatic) is significantly larger than the RMS radius. Even at the corner of an ASI178 (the center to diagonal of an ASI178 is about 4.5mm), the blue bloat is quite bad (their spot diagrams have distances of 3.999 mm and 9.999 mm from the optical axis, so you have to do some guessing of what 4.5 mm is like). And the spot diagrams are paper-simulations. By the time their assemblers are done, the real-world is probably much worse. The GEO radiuses are much larger than the Dawes limit of the optics.
But I doubt the EVOguide is any better, and more likely, knowing the manufacturer, is much worse. SkyWatcher does not even publish spot diagrams. Do you trust manufacturers of technical equipment that do not publish technical specs? We have lots of examples of that lately.
Attaching an electronic focuser to the EVOguide would be a complete nightmare. I have looked at it and short of drilling into the OTA tube itself, there is no neat way to do it. If you remember, I had posted images on how I attached an EAF to the two tapped screw holes of the FMA180p finder mount, by only having to drill the EAF -- no modifications to the stock FMA180p.
Chen